durusmail: quixote-users: PTL and overall site structure
PTL and overall site structure
2004-10-12
2004-10-12
2004-10-12
PTL and overall site structure
Jkx
2004-10-12
On Tuesday 12 October 2004 16:19, Paul Moore wrote:

> This seems odd to me - I see my site in a more object oriented way -
> the standard format is a base class, and specific pages are
> subclasses, which in general only override the "content" method, but
> which could (for example) extend the "footer" method to add something
> to the footer. Something more like
>
>     class Page(SitePage):
>         def content [html] (request):
>             #whatever
>         def footer [html] (request):
>             SitePage.footer(self, request)
>             "The information on this page is confidential"
>
> You get the idea, I hope.
>
> I'm sure this is possible, but I can't quite get my head round how I
> structure things. Does anyone have any pointers to sample code that
> handles pages like this, or some hints on how to structure my
> interface like this (or, indeed warnings as to why this is a really
> bad idea!)

This really sound as Webware use SitePage :) ..

I get into the same trouble when i first come to Quixote. The simplest
way is to


__q_exports = []

def __q_index(req):
     return Page(req)


and simply add the __call__ (or _q_index) in your SitePage class that
do the defaut behaviour.



class SitePage:
     def __q_index(self,req):
  self.head(req)
  self.content(req) ...
         self.footer(req)


The main difference between quixote or webware in this context, is
that : in Webware page rendering is bound to a transaction. so you
          can access  self.request or self.application without pain, this
          is a bit more ticky.


Bye Bye

reply