durusmail: quixote-users: Re: Re: [Quixote-users] why pass request object to public functions /methods
Re: Re: [Quixote-users] why pass request object to public functions /methods
2004-11-08
Re: Re: [Quixote-users] why pass request object to public functions /methods
tecnic@codidoc.com
2004-11-05
Graham wrote:
> (1) implicit namespace magics are bad, (2) the
>word "acquisition" rhymes with "gouge my eyes out with a dull
spoon" and
>(3) things should only be where a developer intentionally puts
them.

Talking about Namespace's: I only know that I don't know
nothing.

In Quixote 2.a?
-Will there be any Quixote1 compatibility facility built-in?
-Will there be an implicit/explicit acquisition/access mechanism?
-Will be a classificatication of namespaces paral.leling python
different context bindings?

Is there someone in the (acquired) namespace who likes to
answer this?

-- Oscar Rambla Serra



reply