Graham wrote: > (1) implicit namespace magics are bad, (2) the >word "acquisition" rhymes with "gouge my eyes out with a dull spoon" and >(3) things should only be where a developer intentionally puts them. Talking about Namespace's: I only know that I don't know nothing. In Quixote 2.a? -Will there be any Quixote1 compatibility facility built-in? -Will there be an implicit/explicit acquisition/access mechanism? -Will be a classificatication of namespaces paral.leling python different context bindings? Is there someone in the (acquired) namespace who likes to answer this? -- Oscar Rambla Serra