A.M. Kuchling wrote:

> I'd like to try implementing a WSGI gateway at some point, but it's
> not a big priority for me and won't happen for months, if at all.  If
> WSGI support is important to the original poster, why not try to
> implement it?

My thought is first to look at turning scgi into a wsgi server as high
performance options are not yet widespread for that.  Then to add wsgi
support for quixote so that it can use a wsgi server itself. Finally as
standard middleware appears for wsgi for sessions, authentication etc to
allow quixote to optionally use these.

All this is away down the line as far as my finding time is concerned.
But it appears to be a reasonable incremental approach even if it is not
the approach to add the most quixote users as soon as possible. To do
that making quixote 2 use wsgi servers first would be a good approach as
there are so far no alternatives available. But I neither have the
knowledge nor time to do that at present.

Regards

Dave
--
Dave Warnock: http://42.blogs.warnock.me.uk