On Nov 29, 2004, at 8:57 AM, Mike Orr wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:02:28AM -0500, David Binger wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 2004, at 2:08 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
>>> One problem I found with a chain of _q_traverse overrides calling
>>> each
>>> other was I wanted the code to execute in a different order than it
>>> was.
>>> I don't remember the exact situation, but it had to do with
>>> _q_traverse
>>> calling itself recursively (i.e., on its subdirectory object), and me
>>> wanting to inject my code in the middle of it rather than before or
>>> after.
>>
>> Maybe the callee should have and use  this injected code instead of
>> the
>> caller?
>
> Which callee are you referring to here?

I'm talking about the _q_traverse bound to the sub-directory instance.
Remember that you can define that yourself, and the _q_traverse of
the sub-directory need not be the same as the _q_traverse of the
parent.