On Thursday 16 December 2004 04:22, David Binger wrote:
> Here's one option for optional $-substitution in templates.
>
> Make [plain] and [html] templates work exactly as before: no
> $-substitution.
> Add support for [plain$] and [html$] templates that do include
> $-substitution.
>
> How does that sound?
>
> David
>

Hi,

My current status is that still don't know if/when/how I will use
$substitutions.
So, my main concern is not finding obstacles to its possible application while
taking the decission.
At this point David's suggestion fits great in that it permits different
potential uses to coexist.

+1

-Oscar Rambla