On Mar 18, 2005, at 6:41 AM, Mario Ruggier wrote:

> On Mar 18, 2005, at 8:52 AM, Mike Orr wrote:
>> If we did have a sandbox, do people have a preference for SourceForge
>> or some other site?  SF is the only one I'm familiar with, and it has
>> a wonderful CVS browse interface.  On the other hand it goes down
>> pretty frequently, the CVS browse interface goes down even more
>> frequently, and I like Subversion better.  :)
>> How is the Quixote source hosted?  I gather from one of the e-mails
>> today it's using some other alternative to CVS?  Would that be an
>> option for a sandbox?  It would need near-unrestricted write
>> permission, and not too burdensome for the user to install client
>> software
>
> This is not quite an answer to this... but, given that mems open
> software is on an svn respoitory, how about a trac site to interface
> to it all? The source and changeset browser is really nice, and
> integration between the ticket system, as well as wiki, is really
> simple and practical.


The MEMS Exchange source is in an svn repository.
I don't think I would be permitted to make a public
repository for the released software, even without
an area for quixote-extras.

I'm +1 on one or more quixote-extras repositories
(independent of me)- -and wiki connections.