On Mar 18, 2005, at 1:23 PM, David Binger wrote:

> The MEMS Exchange source is in an svn repository.
> I don't think I would be permitted to make a public
> repository for the released software, even without
> an area for quixote-extras.

That is because of other things in the repository?

Will it not be feasible to have a separate repository for released
software?
I guess the big question is who will take responsibility for it?

It may be just 'slave' repo... into which specific master revisions are
commited into, e.g. tagged versions only. The purpose would be to
provide versioned access to the code (without necessarily the detail of
individual check-ins) for reference browsing, and that can be referred
to in discussions... tickets and wiki pages.

That repository could also house qx-extras.

Plus, I agree with Michele... only one extras and wiki! It is already
quite confusing to have qx kind of split over mems and quixote.ca. I
think introducing others will only aggravate.
And defn +1 for svn over cvs....

mario