On Mar 18, 2005, at 8:48 AM, Mario Ruggier wrote:

>
> On Mar 18, 2005, at 1:23 PM, David Binger wrote:
>
>> The MEMS Exchange source is in an svn repository.
>> I don't think I would be permitted to make a public
>> repository for the released software, even without
>> an area for quixote-extras.
>
> That is because of other things in the repository?

Not really.  I'm more concerned with licensing/copyright/maintenance
complexity.

>
> Will it not be feasible to have a separate repository for released
> software?
> I guess the big question is who will take responsibility for it?

Right.  The old releases are all still available.  If someone wants
to setup a better presentation of them, through a repository, or a
web page, or whatever, I don't think anyone would mind.  While I
recognize
the value of making it easier to view old versions,  I have no
interest in doing it myself.