On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 05:17:33PM -0400, Greg Ward wrote:
>However, anything belong user/password should be up to applications to
>define.  I don't think Quixote should be in the business of roles,
>privileges, groups, or any of that -- not even defining interfaces for
>applications to implement.  Access control is just too broad and too
>application-specific.

I'm not planning to include this as part of Quixote, but as a
completely separate package.  Any glue connecting to Quixote would be
optional.  (There's little chance of others adopting the classes
without this disconnection.)

--amk