durusmail: quixote-users: non-idempotent GETs
non-idempotent GETs
2005-05-10
2005-05-10
2005-05-10
2005-05-10
2005-05-10
2005-05-11
2005-05-10
2005-05-10
2005-05-10
2005-05-29
2005-05-29
2005-05-29
non-idempotent GETs
Titus Brown
2005-05-10
-> I'm not sure that Quixote does anything that actually needs to be
-> fixed.  The fact that it doesn't, by default, differentiate between
-> GET and POST is a little suboptimal.  It also makes it easy to
-> violate this design principle.  Miguel has no sympathy:
->
->   http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/archive/2005/May-08.html
->
-> The Ruby on Rails guys are planning to work around the inconvenience
-> of using GETs:
->
->   http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000455.html
->
-> I guess Quixote could provide a utility function if the link_to idea
-> catches on.

It might be worth mentioning it somewhere in the docs.  Certainly I've
found that the 'object/delete' functionality is, umm, too obvious not to
use ;).

--titus
reply