durusmail: quixote-users: Session persistence for Quixote 2.0
Session persistence for Quixote 2.0
2005-05-26
2005-05-27
2005-05-27
2005-05-27
2005-05-27
2005-05-27
2005-05-27
2005-05-27
2005-05-28
2005-05-29
2005-05-29
2005-05-29
2005-05-28
2005-05-28
2005-05-29
2005-05-29
Sessions in mod_python (was [Quixote-users] Session persistence...
2005-05-29
Session persistence for Quixote 2.0
vincent delft
2005-05-29
--- Titus Brown  wrote:

> You do need the rollback in any situation involving
> true transactions;
> otherwise multiple processes will not see the same
> committed data until
> after they do a commit.

I'm not sure I understand your point.

If you do a rollback, to "see" the same data, you
loose the current update, correct ?

Are you sure that's what one expect ?

By reading the psycopg doc, they assure consistency
for "heavily" multi-threaded applications.

Do you think that having (let's imagine) 8 SCGI
threads , we can put psycopg in default ?

Vincent.




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
reply