Neil Schemenauer said:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0700, Mike Orr wrote:
>> I've been using it on Apache2 for several months, and haven't had any
>> problems except the Refresh bug, which is fixed in version 1.
>
> That's good to hear.
>
>> know why they keep saying it's not widely tested.  How wide is "wide"?
>
> We only have direct experience running mod_scgi with Apache 1 on
> high traffic sites.  We also haven't heard many success stories
> regarding mod_scgi for Apache 2, mostly problem reports.  It's hard
> to get a sense widely it is being used.

That's a point, my sites are pretty low traffic since they're
information-sharing resources rather than public.  Still, maybe we can say
"mod_scgi/Apache2 has been tested on moderate-traffic sites running Linux
and performs well.  It needs further testing on high-traffic sites and
other platforms before we can unconditionally recommend it in those areas.
 If you have an opportunity to test it in those areas, please tell us
about your good/bad experiences on the list."

What other kinds of problem reports have you gotten?  Things that haven't
been fixed?


--
-- Mike Orr