On Aug 10, 2005, at 3:48 PM, mso@oz.net wrote: > > This is not related to moving stuff from SCRIPT_NAME to PATH_INFO if > PATH_INFO wasn't set correctly. I assume that's already been done > by this > point. I don't think that happening in the (broken) case here. I think PATH_INFO is always empty and SCRIPT_NAME always has the full path. A redirect won't help because the PATH_INFO would still be empty.