durusmail: quixote-users: Re: Popularity of Quixote
Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-17
2005-10-17
Re: Popularity of Quixote
2005-10-18
2005-10-19
2005-10-19
2005-10-19
ANN: TURBOZCHERRYPLORAILS
2005-10-19
2005-10-19
2005-10-19
2005-10-22
2005-10-22
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-25
2005-10-26
2005-10-27
2005-10-27
2005-10-27
2005-10-27
2005-10-27
2005-10-27
2005-10-27
DateTime quoting in psycopg
2005-10-28
Re: Popularity of Quixote
Michael Watkins
2005-10-19
* Graham Fawcett wrote [2005-10-19 09:16:00 -0400]:

> Quixote doesn't need to be uber-popular in order to survive. Just as
> many of us choose to use Medusa, in spite of Twisted being the current
> poster child for Python networking, Quixote will maintain an audience
> just by remaining simple and excellent. But it's realistic to expect
> diminished growth in the Quixote community unless something sexy and
> Quixote-powered draws attention back toward it.

Simple and excellent but quiet isn't such a bad thing.

Its great these other frameworks are raising the profile level of Python
itself; no doubt some developers new to the language will shop around and be
attracted to Quixote, or other solid frameworks not currently at the top of
Google's page rank, on their style and internals not just popularity.

Ultimately all roads lead to the same place, sooner or later the web
framework chooser needs to sit down and write applications...

reply