I'm here too ;-).

Personnally, I've started with Qx several years ago
(was version 1.???).

Over the time and by curiosity I've tried other python
solutions: Twisted, Cherrypy, snakelets, draco,
webware and even Turbogears. But my "production"
applications are still with Quixote. I prefer quixote
mainly for his stability, simplicty (easy to use) and
for his flexibility (run on windows, Linux, ... and
because of integration with  scgi, fastcgi, ...).

If you permit to give my 2 cents, I think that several
points could be improved:
- uptodate documentation for newbies (kind of Howto)
- having a quixote planet
- having a screen casts
- a search into the mailing list (and not google or
gmane)

I'm not a real fan of "ptl", but prefer cheetah. This
is maybe more a question of taste.


Vincent

--- Neil Schemenauer  wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:11:31PM -0700, Orr, Steve
> wrote:
> > What is the current state of Quixote?
>
> I guess either people are happy or they left for
> other frameworks.
> It seems to me that Quixote is losing a marketing
> war with other
> frameworks.  That's a shame because I think Quixote
> does a lot of
> things well.
>
> At this point the only major changes I would make
> would be to make
> it more modular and more library like.  Ideally, QP
> could be built
> using components from Quixote.  The restructuring
> would probably
> consist of backwards incompatible changes and I'm
> not sure the
> community is up for that.
>
> Oh yes, obviously the documentation could use a lot
> of work.  We
> should have at least an up-to-date high-level
> tutorial and low-level
> documentation for all the components.
>
>   Neil
> _______________________________________________
> Quixote-users mailing list
> Quixote-users@mems-exchange.org
>
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com