durusmail: quixote-users: RELEASED: scgi 1.11
RELEASED: scgi 1.11
2006-08-15
2006-08-15
2006-08-15
RELEASED: scgi 1.11
Damjan
2006-08-15
[ resending the message to the list, prevously has gone only to Neil ]

> The SCGI protocol is a replacement for the Common Gateway Interface
> (CGI) protocol.  It is similar to FastCGI but is designed to be
> easier to implement.  The scgi package includes implementions of the
> SCGI protocol for Python, Apache 1 and Apache 2.
....
> Note that this release represents an opening up of the development
> process.  I hope that the switch to bazaar-ng will make it easier
> for users in the community to contribute to the development of the
> package.

Does this mean that we now might see the support for UNIX domain sockets
added?

Also one question about SCRIPT_NAME. WSGI requires that:
SCRIPT_NAME
    The initial portion of the request URL's "path" that corresponds to
the application object, so that the application knows its virtual
"location". This may be an empty string, if the application corresponds
to the "root" of the server.

Is this always true with SCGI? Can the SCGI provided SCRIPT_NAME be
trusted and passed to a WSGI application as is?


--
damjan | дамјан
This is my jabber ID -->         damjan@bagra.net.mk
 -- not my mail address, it's a Jabber ID --^ :)
reply