It's a good choice to go to Lighhtpd ;-).
Look at my bench.
http://www.quixote.ca/qx/LighttpdScgi
I know, a bit old.

More over Lighttpd is much more simplier to configure
and tune than Apache. But this is a personnal opinion.









--- Arturo FM  wrote:

> Hi!
> Actually, all my applications with Quixote runs with
> Apache and mod_scgi. Now I'm thinking about
> replacing
> Apache for lighttpd. This web server has intregrated
> support for scgi and doesn't need an additional
> module. I read about great performance of sites
> using
> lighttpd.
> I usually work with Debian GNU/Linux and FreeBSD in
> my
> servers.
> Have anybody a great experience using lighttpd
> instead Apache?
>
> ----------------------------
> Arturo Fernandez (artufm at yahoo dot es)
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo.
> Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por
> minuto.
> http://es.voice.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Quixote-users mailing list
> Quixote-users@mems-exchange.org
>
http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users
>




________________________________________________________________________________
____
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news