durusmail: quixote-users: Inconsistency between mod_scgi behavior and published scgi protocol?
Inconsistency between mod_scgi behavior and published scgi protocol?
2008-06-23
Inconsistency between mod_scgi behavior and published scgi protocol?
Inconsistency between mod_scgi behavior and published scgi protocol?
2008-06-23
2008-06-24
Inconsistency between mod_scgi behavior and published scgi protocol?
Neil Schemenauer
2008-06-24
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:18:42PM -0700, Al Pacifico wrote:
> I don't mean to nitpick, but shouldn't the SCGI protocol specification state
> that an empty value in the header is acceptable, then?
[snip]

Good catch (and I don't consider it a nit pick).  Empty values are
definitely allowed.  I'll fix the spec.

  Neil
reply