On 26 July 2002, Andreas Kostyrka said:
> I do not know if this is so. As quixote seems to me much like a
> refreshed Bobo (ZPublisher), I'd assume the only sensible way to run it
> (production wise) would be something longrunning.

Absolutely correct.  Quixote has to import a lot of stuff just to get
started, so using a CGI driver script in production would be nuts.  It's
*very* handy for development though.

FastCGI seems to work pretty well for simple stuff, but it kept flaking
out for us on our main web site.  It could be just that Apache's
mod_fastcgi is flaky; we never looked into it deeply.  I think Neil was
just repulsed by the complexity of FastCGI, so he wrote SCGI instead.
It's been working just fine for us for a couple of months now.

Oh, there's always mod_python too, but I still haven't gotten around to
playing with it seriously.

        Greg