I still wonder if anybody would comment on it.  Or, if it's just
something really obvious, could somebody show me the way. :)

--
Misha

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:01:24AM +0100, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
> It looks like the publishers of static files use the same constructs:
>
>     f = open (filename)
>     return f.read ()
>
> I wonder how memory effective this is.  And if these are not memory
> effective what would be the best approach for serving big static files?
> (Maybe it would even require some sort of rewriting of HTTPResponse
> code?)
>
> TIA,
>
> --
> Misha
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quixote-users mailing list
> Quixote-users@mems-exchange.org
> http://www.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/quixote-users