durusmail: durus-users: Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
Trivial doc/interface fix
2006-03-13
Re: Trivial doc/interface fix
2006-03-13
2006-03-13
A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-13
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-13
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
2006-03-14
2006-03-13
2006-03-21
Re: A new backend storage (Re: [Durus-users] Re: Trivial doc/interface fix)
Peter Wilkinson
2006-03-13
On 14/03/2006, at 9:18 AM, Jesus Cea wrote:

> I have several small issues, nevertheless. For example, objects
> come to
> the storage engine already serialized. I would rather prefer to do the
> serialization myself. I don't need, for example, to keep the first
> eight
> bytes of the object in the database, since that is the OID and I
> already
> have the OID as the database key.

I'll second this, my previous email makes note of the same thing,
different reasons but basically the same need.

Peter W.




reply