durusmail: durus-users: Re: doubt about durus 3.4 inner working (was: Re: [Durus-users] Memory leak: Minimal bugfix in "_persistent.c")
Re: doubt about durus 3.4 inner working (was: Re: [Durus-users] Memory leak: Minimal bugfix in "_persistent.c")
2006-05-12
Re: doubt about durus 3.4 inner working (was: Re: [Durus-users] Memory leak: Minimal bugfix in "_persistent.c")
David Binger
2006-05-12
> By the way, why is "sync_count" a full python object instead of a
> simple
> "int", like "p_touched" was in Durus 3.3?. I suppose there is a
> reason I
> don't know :)...

The p_touched values now increase "forever", and we
were worried about the behavior when the maxint value
was reached.







reply