durusmail: qp: Re: Another Proposed Template Notation
Another Proposed Template Notation
2007-11-01
Re: Another Proposed Template Notation
2007-11-01
2007-11-01
2007-11-01
2007-11-01
Re: Another Proposed Template Notation
2007-11-02
2007-11-02
2007-11-02
2007-11-02
2007-11-02
Re: Another Proposed Template Notation
David Binger
2007-11-02
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Michael Watkins wrote:

> f it does, for users of
> customizable editors at least, a syntax file mod may be in order.

The f:xml form looks nice in TextMate with no change.

This looks like the winner to me.
(The [html]  or [plain] syntax will still be supported, though,
at least for a while.)


reply