durusmail: quixote-users: Quixote with ZPT?
Quixote with ZPT?
2002-11-05
2002-11-06
2002-11-06
This is why Quixote appeals to me (was: Quixote with ZPT?)
2002-11-06
This is why Quixote appeals to me (was: Quixote with ZPT?)
This is why Quixote appeals to me (was: Quixote with ZPT?)
2002-11-06
This is why Quixote appeals to me
2002-11-06
2002-11-11
Quixote with ZPT?
Greg Ward
2002-11-11
On 06 November 2002, Bud P. Bruegger said:
> A shortcoming of this and all DOM-based methods (and I believe also
> ZTP?) is in the granularity; I don't believe it is the page (document)
> that should be the object of design but rather a page fragment (DOM
> fragment) that I normally call widget.  These are parts like headers,
> footers, titles, nav bars, form elements, etc. that are typically
> reused on multiple pages.

Good point, and a very good argument in favour of PTL.  Perhaps my
favourite thing about PTL is that it lets *you* decide on the level of
granularity you want.  You can have a PTL template (or Python function)
return a single HTML tag, a whole document, or anywhere in between.

I think I can make a solemn vow that nothing DOM-like will ever appear
in Quixote.

        Greg

reply